How the 28 e-commerce services Sweden is reviewing score today
On 3 March 2026 the Swedish Post and Telecom Authority (PTS) published the names of 28 e-commerce services whose accessibility it is reviewing under Sweden's transposition of the European Accessibility Act. When it opened the review in October 2025, PTS said it checks that the homepage, one product page and the search function are perceivable, operable, understandable and robust.
A regulator publishing its own list is unusual, and it makes the question answerable: what does an automated check actually find on the sites a European regulator has decided to look at? Everything below comes from the same scan any visitor can run here for free, on the same day, with the same method.
A median rather than an average, so one site that blocks automated visits does not move the headline number for the rest.
7 of the 28 sites have no result here, because the scanner could not load a usable page or the owner removed the report.
Scoring highest today
4 services share the best score in this set, at 100/100. There is no ranking of the lowest: an ordered list of the worst sites is a pillory, and it is not what this data is for.
-
coop.se joint position 1, score 100 out of 100 0 WCAG criteria failed on the entry page
-
hemkop.se joint position 1, score 100 out of 100 0 WCAG criteria failed on the entry page
-
mq.se joint position 1, score 100 out of 100 0 WCAG criteria failed on the entry page
-
xxl.se joint position 1, score 100 out of 100 0 WCAG criteria failed on the entry page
-
ahlens.se joint position 5, score 90 out of 100 1 WCAG criterion failed on the entry page
-
apoteket.se joint position 5, score 90 out of 100 1 WCAG criterion failed on the entry page
-
biltema.se joint position 5, score 90 out of 100 1 WCAG criterion failed on the entry page
-
ellos.se joint position 5, score 90 out of 100 1 WCAG criterion failed on the entry page
-
kappahl.com joint position 5, score 90 out of 100 1 WCAG criterion failed on the entry page
-
mathem.se joint position 5, score 90 out of 100 1 WCAG criterion failed on the entry page
-
systembolaget.se joint position 5, score 90 out of 100 1 WCAG criterion failed on the entry page
Every service on the list
Alphabetical, not ordered by score. Each row links to that domain's report, which carries its own removal link.
Total findings counts every rule axe-core reports. Only the ones carrying a WCAG success criterion move the score, which is why a page can show findings and still score 100: the rest are best-practice advice, not conformance failures.
| Service | Score | WCAG criteria failed | Total findings | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| adlibris.com | no result | — | — | — |
| ahlens.se scoring highest | 90/100 | 1 | 1 | |
| apohem.se | 80/100 | 2 | 3 | |
| apotea.se | no result | — | — | — |
| apoteket.se scoring highest | 90/100 | 1 | 5 | |
| apotekethjartat.se | 80/100 | 2 | 2 | |
| biltema.se scoring highest | 90/100 | 1 | 1 | |
| boozt.com | 70/100 | 3 | 20 | |
| clasohlson.com | 35/100 | 4 | 27 | |
| coop.se scoring highest | 100/100 | 0 | 0 | |
| ellos.se scoring highest | 90/100 | 1 | 5 | |
| hemkop.se scoring highest | 100/100 | 0 | 0 | |
| hm.com | no result | — | — | — |
| ica.se | 65/100 | 3 | 12 | |
| ikea.com | no result | — | — | — |
| jula.se | no result | — | — | — |
| kappahl.com scoring highest | 90/100 | 1 | 1 | |
| kronansapotek.se | 85/100 | 1 | 1 | |
| lager157.com | 85/100 | 1 | 1 | |
| lyko.se | 65/100 | 3 | 10 | |
| mathem.se scoring highest | 90/100 | 1 | 4 | |
| mq.se scoring highest | 100/100 | 0 | 0 | |
| netonnet.se | no result | — | — | — |
| snusbolaget.se | no result | — | — | — |
| stadium.se | 80/100 | 2 | 7 | |
| systembolaget.se scoring highest | 90/100 | 1 | 1 | |
| willys.se | 55/100 | 3 | 116 | |
| xxl.se scoring highest | 100/100 | 0 | 0 |
How to read this, and how not to
- We did not choose this list. It is the set of services the regulator named, in the order it named them.
- One page per service was tested: the entry page. This is not a verdict on a whole site, and it is not the review the regulator is carrying out.
- An automated scan reaches about a third of the WCAG success criteria. It can show that a page fails; it cannot show that a page passes.
- A low score is not a finding of illegality, and a high score is not compliance. No EU regulator has issued a fine under the EAA to date.
- Scores move when markup moves. Every row is dated, and re-running the scan is how the date changes.
The full method, including how the score is calculated and exactly what it cannot check, is on how we test.
If this is your site
Two things are open to you, both immediately. You can remove your report page from a link on the report itself, with no account and no wait, and the row here becomes a name with no score. Or you can tell us what the scan got wrong, and if it is wrong we will say so on this page rather than quietly change a number.
Sources
Published 2 September 2026. This page reports automated test results and is not legal advice.
Run the same scan on your own site
Same engine, same method, same day. Free and without an account.
Related: how the EAA applies in Sweden, every EAA date by country, and what the first ruling decided.