What real websites score on WCAG 2.2 AA
Every report below comes from loading the page in a real browser and running axe-core against the rendered DOM. Each one lists the failing rules, the WCAG success criterion behind them and the markup that fixes them.
Scan your own site freeRecent reports
How to read a score
A page starts at 100 and loses points for each distinct failing rule, weighted by severity. Ten images missing alt text cost the same as one, because they share a single fix; a critical rule costs more than a minor one. The result is deterministic: the same page always scores the same, and the number moves only when the markup does.
A high score is not a conformance claim. Automated testing covers roughly a third of WCAG success criteria, so it can prove a site fails but never that it passes. The European Accessibility Act expects conformance with EN 301 549, which points at WCAG 2.2 AA in full, plus a published accessibility statement.
Fixing what a report finds
Every rule Conforma reports has a fix guide with the failing markup next to the corrected markup. Working through the critical and serious rows first is usually the fastest route to a materially more accessible site.