Skip to content
EU Accessibility Act Fix guides Pricing
Log in
Conforma
Accessibility reports

What real websites score on WCAG 2.2 AA

Each report comes from loading the page in a real browser and running axe-core against it. It lists the failing rules, the WCAG success criterion behind each one and the markup that fixes it.

Scan your own site free

Recent reports

How to read a score

A page starts at 100 and loses points for each distinct failing rule, weighted by severity. Ten images missing alt text cost the same as one, because they share a single fix; a critical rule costs more than a minor one. The same page always scores the same, and the number moves only when the markup does.

A high score is not a conformance claim. Automated testing covers about a third of the WCAG success criteria, so it can prove a site fails but never that it passes. Under the European Accessibility Act the reference for websites is EN 301 549, whose version V4.1.1 adopts WCAG 2.2 AA, and a provider publishes how its service meets the accessibility requirements.

Fixing what a report finds

Every rule Conforma reports has a fix guide with the failing markup next to the corrected markup. Start with the critical and serious rows; that is usually the fastest route to a more accessible site.